Yugioh Ruling Help? Command Knight and Marauding Captain Ruling Confusion? - play field command
OK, it goes to both sides, because running the master and marauding knight in my Command Deck Warrior, and I have different rulings from different people.
1. If you control two marauding captains with any number of monsters on the field, no spells or traps and monsters control the opponent does not usually directly (attack mainly two computers and two creators, as it can on both the master and looters target relate an attack, can you send me now? "In the attack pretty sure that he is not, as I follow the same strategy in video games, playing games, which can not attack.
2. If control of only two orders gentlemen, the same situation as before, but no other monsters on my side of the field can be directly on me? I know the impact of the commands Knight and legendary fishermen are about the same, but if the control of IMU and legendary fisherman can attack your opponent directly if you have no control over other monsters. But I looked around me, and apparently two orders Knights at the time, hAVING no monsters on the field prevented that attack my opponent.
Please let me know the shortcomings of these two situations, because they are the most important cards in the deck and my warrior, whether the effects would allow the attacking opponents directly, if they do not have any attack my monster, I build my deck.
Best response to clarify this for me:)
Thursday, January 7, 2010
Play Field Command Yugioh Ruling Help? Command Knight And Marauding Captain Ruling Confusion?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
In the case of principals back to attack at least two captains marauding monsters and non-warriors, your opponent can not with their monsters. Http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Card_Rulings:Marauding_Captain There are two points of evidence to that effect. The first sentence states
"If you can master two robbers their side of the field, the enemy no face-up Warrior-Type monsters you control attack. You can directly attack life points, when control of a monster, an effect that (it's like a rainbow of flowers , Inaba White Rabbit, or a monster Toon). you can not also be able to control attack Warrior type monsters. "
In this resolution states that the opponent can attack directly if you have a monster that they can do, not what every monster.
The second point of evidence:
"Glasses Marshmallon: While you have" Marshmallon "," Marshmallon Glasses "and" marauding captain upside down in your area and start "s DNA-operation", the selection of the Warrior-Type, the adversaryable to attack with their monsters. "
This combination of letters creates the situation in question (two captains and a kind of monster marauding warriors). Due Marshmallon glasses Marshmallon gives the same effect as Captain Marauder (Since the operation of DNA is, Guerrero). In this case, the sentence says that the enemy can attack with their monsters. "
When the marauding monster cards are all you (or at least 1 and DNA decoyroid) surgery as a warrior, his opponent atking limited, unless it is a monster that has the ability to ATK has directly or through the ability to direct ATK. If you are a monster face down, down is if ATK monster, of course, in the face. If Command Knight 2 can be directly ATK, provided there are no other monsters you control. Reasons for decision making is different. Marauders said: "My opponent can not select another," says Mr. Knight, where the command is "your opponent can not select it. From marauding said:" You can not select another "and then the marauding monsters ATK goals to look at but not hit in this sense to say that both be attacked happened in simutaneously Yugioh!. By Command Knight said he did not "choose this option, will not command the monsters are not the knights as a target for ATC and the right to LP. .. if any of the other monsters, of course.
Post a Comment